Lewis Rowe, confirming that public initiatives are for the benefit for the public good in all domains for the state of Arizona.
Initiatives are included as follows:
Activating the initiative for the probable cause of illegal implanting and the longevity of the procedures that conform to human experimentation by neurotech devices. As stated in the Mk ultra documents that were provided by the Church Committee in the 1970’s about unwitting experiments conducted on individuals without awareness and consent during the era of the 1950’s. These experiments proceeded unknowingly to individuals throughout the public. In the 1990’s Bill Clinton, the United States president apologized for the human experimentation that were involved with Mk ultra.
In this summary I will provide documents and information to the illegal implanting of small high-tech devices for better understanding of the probable cause issues at hand. Resorting to information from the past, leading to the efforts of individuals using the same pattern routines as in the days of Mk ultra that were conducted for research of individuals that were compromised for illegal experimentation.
Neuroethics and neurology are serious endeavors into the field of scientific research and study. Research and study for example, further brain research through the use of artificial intelligence (AI). Proposing new laws for the state of Arizona, in the US are examples of the prolonged and unwitting efforts for neuro BCI (Brain to computer interfaces) illegal chipping with micro semiconductors. The same probable cause of units that are nonconsesual injections into the human body with small devices capable of traveling to specific locations in the human body.
Through illegal BCI device usage by injections, the capabilities of these devices utilize the functionality of artificial intelligence neuro information datasets. Datasets of modeling concepts of the human brain grasped by neuroscience, neuro imaging, neuro modulated systems acquired by artificial intelligence, neuro doctors and scientists. Artificial intelligence acts upon training based algorithms and algorithmic parameters; setting the brain modeling algorithmic procedures and parameters for the AI’s system to be utilized and functional. A type of neurotechnology AI model that connects to the human body, via brain to computer interfaces, small BCI implants which are micro semiconductors.
New ethics need to be involved protecting the public from the type of devices that accumulate data theft of physical biology. These concepts of the human brain have been precisely modeled for parameter use and discovery projects into more in depth human body anatomy, neurological and data sequenced analysis. Mimicking the neuro biological member, that is the individual used for heavily sedating configurations of neurotechnology and the bypass of individuals consciousness.
Case for Barbra Lindsey, resident of Texas illegally implanted by a doctor at a dermatology office with two small devices in her forehead. Case number to the supreme court No. 05-20-01081-CV.
After Barbra Lindsey discovered she was implanted the small devices and were medically removed and sent to a college university in California for examination. The university determined the small implants as super high-tech devices. As Barbra Lindsey the unwitting victim of illegal and nonconsensual implantation, began a court case against the dermatology office that assumed the role of implanting Ms. Barbra Lindsey unknowingly.
Cases such as Barbra Lindsey’s are happening all over the country of the United States of America.
With multiple cases over the issues of being injected by doctors at different hospitals and cities, states, etc. These cases led to illegal brain to computer interface intelligence research programs, restricting an individual from help or medical treatment and restrictions on neuro freedom and cognitive abilities as if the individual is possessed.
The neurotechnology bills in both states that include Colorado and Minnesota read as personal cognitive freedoms are fundamentals of neuro privacy and with informed consent only to enter an individuals mind. These are new legislation’s awaiting to be passed hopefully by the end of the year, 2024.
The two bills set for voting need to be comprehended by all state governments, legislatures, congressmen and including the senate. Gaining momentum for the state of Arizona and all other states to consider passing legislation on neurotechnology, neuro data theft, neurological and biological information protections against mental manipulationsand laws against the entities unitizing the approaches to capture brain data, via remote neurotechnology that uses dangerous methods for unwitting for individuals that come with consequences, due to the fact there are no laws against such acts.
The drafted legislation for Arizona, would be approached in ways to propose and present new crime fighting units to stop illegal use of neurotechnology. Apprehending individuals using remote brain to computer interfaces and all other forms of neurotechnology that are capable and able to steal personal information from an individual. Police departments need to be more with advanced with cyber-networks and communication based algorithms to capture these entities. Through, either localized police detective units or through interconnected jurisdictions as the state would allow. A funding grant for local and state government police, would be able to help protect people from these vicious crimes that can put an individual’s brain in the hands of another.
These legislative means for police should be added to the bill for purposes of state funding, opening newer model departments for neuro theft as we approach the times for super advanced technology. Adding a prolonged endeavor of methods and means to incarcerate the individuals bound by state laws for the use of illegal and critical and emerging technologies.
I will also add attachments for the both bills Colorado HB 24-1058 and Minnesota HF 1904 at the bottom for review by the city government.
Advocating for your rights! 