Author: Advocacy For Neuro Rights Organization

When the Smallest Things Begin to Matter Most: Neuro Rights in the Age of Invisible Power

by Advocacy For Neuro Rights Organization

There was a time when power was loud. It came with visibility, fire, and force. Power has been quieter today. smaller. It passes via chemical molecules, electrical impulses, algorithms, and nanoparticles before evading the senses and landing in the brain of a person, which is the most fragile structure we have.

This is the moment in history where neuro rights are no longer theoretical. They are necessary.

At Neuro Rights Advocacy and Humanitarian Community Health Work, we operate at the intersection of nanotechnology in healthcare, pharmacology, artificial intelligence in medicine, and humanitarian ethics. Our work is not rooted in fear of technology, but in reverence for the mind.

Nanotechnology in Medicine and the New Intimacy of Healing

Nanotechnology has given modern medicine an almost intimate precision. These days, medications may be designed to enter the circulation, pass through the blood–brain barrier, and release therapeutic substances precisely where neuronal circuits are compromised. Treatment for mental health issues, brain traumas, and neurological illnesses has changed as a result.

But intimacy without ethics becomes intrusion.

At the nano scale, toxins and neurotoxic compounds no longer announce themselves. Their effects may emerge slowly, through altered cognition, disrupted emotional regulation, or subtle neurological shifts. This is not speculation; it is an acknowledged uncertainty within current scientific literature on nanotechnology toxicity and brain health.

What we release into the body at a molecular level can echo across years of mental life.

Neuro rights advocacy insists that innovation must remain accountable, especially when its effects are invisible.

Pharmacology, Neurotoxins, and the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC)

Modern pharmacology and nano-biotechnology do not exist in a vacuum. There is a legal and ethical framework that already recognizes the danger of chemicals designed to interfere with the nervous system.

Under the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), neurotoxic agents are explicitly prohibited due to their capacity to disrupt cognition, behavior, and bodily control. What is less widely understood is that long-standing research on chemical weapons ethics and dual-use science, such as work conducted at the University of Bradford (UK), has begun to intersect with early discussions around emerging neurotechnology’s. While the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) does not govern neuro rights, it provides an important legal precedent for recognizing how advances in chemistry can carry neurological implications. 

Research at the University of Bradford in the UK has also similarly recognized how environmental toxins, neurotechnology, and AI may affect the central nervous system, while also identifying the risks posed by dual-use technologies, those capable of serving health benefits while remaining vulnerable to misuse by bad actors.

Academic institutions, including Bradford, are now in the early stages of exploring how lessons from chemical non-proliferation and ethics may inform future neuro rights frameworks, particularly as nanotechnology and neuroscience continue to converge.

This matters.

Ethics must advance more quickly than application when the same scientific instruments might be employed to injure or to cure. The CWC’s reasoning is extended into civilian life by neuro rights legislation and regulations, which shield people against uncontrolled neurological manipulation masquerading as advancement in addition to weaponry.

Artificial Intelligence, Neural Implantations, and Mental Privacy

Artificial intelligence and neurotechnology are now deeply intertwined. AI systems decode neural signals, predict behavioral patterns, and learn directly from brain activity. Neural implantations and brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) offer extraordinary promise, restoring communication, mobility, and independence for people with neurological impairments.

Yet the moment neural data is extracted, it becomes vulnerable.

Who owns a person’s thoughts once they are translated into data?
 Who protects mental privacy when algorithms learn faster than laws can adapt?

Without enforceable neuro rights and ethical AI governance, cognition risks being treated as a resource rather than a human right. This concern has been echoed by neuroscientists, including Rafael Yuste of Columbia University, who consistently emphasize that neurotechnology’s ability to read or influence brain activity necessitates explicit protections for mental privacy, identity, and agency.

The purpose of neuro rights is to prevent this shift from occurring quietly.

Cognition runs the danger of being viewed as a resource rather than a human right in the absence of enforceable NeuroRights legislation and moral AI governance. The purpose of neuro rights is to stop it from happening.

Neuro Rights as a Humanitarian and Public Health Priority

Although neuro rights are frequently addressed in elite academic circles, their most pressing application is in underprivileged communities, areas devastated by violence, and healthcare systems where regulation, informed consent, and access are precarious. 

Technological harm is rarely distributed equally.

At Advocacy for Neuro Rights Inc., our humanitarian focus includes the pursuit of inexpensive and feasible neurological treatment plans, particularly for individuals affected by environmental, industrial, and occupational toxin exposure. Increasing evidence suggests that chronic exposure to microplastics, migrating industrial chemicals, endocrine-disrupting compounds, and emerging nanoparticle technologies may place sustained stress on neurological and endocrine systems. These effects often manifest subtly, through dysregulated stress responses, adrenal dysfunction, cognitive fatigue, mood instability, and altered neurological resilience, long before they are clinically recognized.

In response, collaboration with multiple clinics allows existing treatment approaches to be gathered, examined, and refined. From these observations, newer healthcare models begin to form, organized around toxic exposure patterns, endocrine dysfunction, and neurological regulation rather than isolated symptoms.

International attention has begun to reflect these concerns. United Nations–affiliated discussions on neurotechnology and human rights increasingly acknowledge that the combined impact of toxins, artificial intelligence, and neurotechnology can be life-altering, particularly when individuals are affected without meaningful consent.

Academic research at the University of Bradford has similarly recognized how environmental toxins, neurotechnology, and AI may affect the central nervous system, while also identifying the risks posed by dual-use technologies, those capable of serving health benefits while remaining vulnerable to misuse by bad actors.

These dynamics extend beyond individual health. Persistent endocrine disruption and irregular stress regulation, now observed at scale, signal broader public health implications with social and humanitarian consequences.

Advocacy for Neuro Rights Inc. calls for stronger legal frameworks and protections proportionate to these emerging realities. This includes engagement with legislators across multiple states as neuro rights proposals enter state and federal discussion. While many initiatives arise independently, insight is offered into consent standards, neural data protection, dual-use risk, and the foundational elements that such frameworks must include.

Efforts such as the MIND Act, emphasizing consent and protections for neuro-data prior to advanced neurotechnology use, reflect this shift. Academic analysis from the University of Alabama further reinforces the need for strong implementation, safeguards for vulnerable populations, and recognition of the privacy of thought itself.

From Neuro Rights Advocacy to Clinical Research and Healing

As part of our humanitarian mission, Neuro Rights Advocacy and Humanitarian Community Health Work is preparing for a clinical study focused on improving access to ethical neurological healthcare.

Our research explores new healthcare definitions and techniques—looking beyond isolated symptoms to understand how:

This is not speculative futurism. It is an effort to redefine healthcare around healing rather than control, restoration rather than intervention.

Supporting Neuro Rights, Ethical Innovation, and Brain Health

Neuro rights are not anti-technology. They are pro-human continuity.

They ask us to pause before normalizing intrusion, to legislate before harm becomes invisible, and to protect minds before markets decide their value.

As we work toward becoming a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization, we invite those who believe in ethical neurotechnology, humanitarian healthcare, and mental autonomy to support this mission. Donations help fund advocacy, education, research, and future clinical studies dedicated to protecting and healing the human brain.

The future is being written at the smallest scale imaginable.
 What matters now is whether it is written with care

References 

  • Yuste, R., et al. (2017–2023).
    Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI.
    Nature; Columbia University NeuroRights Initiative.
     Establishes the core framework for mental privacy, agency, identity, and consent in neurotechnology. Frequently cited in discussions of neural data governance and cognitive liberty.


  • Columbia University – NeuroRights Initiative
    Ongoing research and policy advocacy addressing the ethical, legal, and societal implications of neurotechnology, including brain–computer interfaces and neural data extraction.


  • Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW).
    International treaty prohibiting neurotoxic agents and chemicals designed to interfere with the nervous system. Serves as a legal precedent for regulating chemistry with neurological impact.


  • University of Bradford (UK) – Peace Studies & International Development / Dual-Use Ethics Research.
    Long-standing scholarship on chemical weapons ethics, dual-use technologies, and the neurological implications of chemical and technological advances, including risks to the central nervous system.


  • Bradford Disarmament Research Centre (BDRC).
    Research on dual-use science, ethical governance, and the intersection of chemical, biological, and emerging neurotechnologies.


  • United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR).
    Human Rights and Emerging Digital Technologies (reports and expert consultations).
    Addresses neurotechnology, AI, consent, and human rights implications, including life-altering impacts without meaningful consent.


  • United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).
    Ethics of Artificial Intelligence & Emerging Technologies.
    Explores ethical governance of AI and neurotechnology, particularly in relation to human dignity, autonomy, and societal impact.


  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) – Human Rights Institute.
    “Neurorights and Mental Privacy” (2025).
    https://sites.uab.edu/humanrights/2025/11/11/neurorights-and-mental-privacy/
    Discusses implementation challenges, bad actors, protection of vulnerable populations, and the privacy of thought in neurotechnology governance.


  • World Health Organization (WHO).
    Environmental Health & Chemical Exposure Reports.
    Documents the neurological and endocrine effects of environmental and industrial toxin exposure, including chronic low-dose exposure.


  • European Commission – Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR).
    Guidance on the Potential Risks of Nanotechnologies.
    Addresses uncertainties around nanoparticle toxicity, blood–brain barrier interaction, and long-term neurological effects.


  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS).
    Research on endocrine-disrupting chemicals, stress regulation, adrenal function, and neurological health.


  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
    Microplastics and Human Health Reports.
    Examines microplastic exposure pathways, bioaccumulation, and emerging concerns related to neurological and endocrine systems.


  • U.S. Legislative Initiatives on Neuro-data Protection (e.g., MIND Act).
    Emerging legal frameworks emphasizing consent, neural data protection, and safeguards prior to advanced neurotechnology deployment.

You can also view the article on our Medium page.

View at Medium.com

When Healing Becomes Intrusion—Why Neuro Rights Matter Now

by Advocacy For Neuro Rights Organization

There was a time when power was loud—visible in fire, force, and spectacle. Today, power is quieter. It moves through molecules, algorithms, and neural data, slipping past our senses and settling in the brain—the most fragile structure we have.

This is why neuro rights are no longer theoretical. They are necessary.
At Neuro Rights Advocacy and Humanitarian Community Health Work, we believe that intimacy in medicine must be matched by ethics. Nanotechnology now allows medications to cross the blood–brain barrier with surgical precision. But what happens when that same precision is used without consent, without oversight, or without accountability?

We advocate for enforceable neuro rights because the same tools that heal can also harm. Under the Chemical Weapons Convention, neurotoxins are banned for their ability to disrupt cognition and control behavior. Yet in civilian life, the line between therapy and manipulation is blurring—and vulnerable communities are often the first to be exposed.

Artificial intelligence and brain–computer interfaces offer extraordinary promise. But once neural data is extracted, who owns it? Who protects it? Without neuro rights legislation, cognition risks becoming a resource, not a human right.

Our work focuses on ethical innovation, affordable neurological care, and safeguards for those least likely to be protected. We are preparing clinical research that redefines healing—not as control, but as restoration. We believe the future is being written at the smallest scale imaginable. What matters now is whether it is written with care.

Neuro Rights Update 7/5/25

by Advocacy For Neuro Rights Organization

By Lewis Rowe

Advocacy for Neuro Rights has shed some light on what it really means to have neurology-based consent when it comes to our individuality. Considering the impact of tech and pharmaceuticals, it’s honestly pretty messed up how some folks are trying to capture and store our personal data. Data collection could seriously change the game, especially if we get to use info from neurological research. But without a solid backup from the outdated legal systems we have and with due process being totally ignored, we’re stuck with a bunch of useless laws that don’t really help—just federal codes and state laws that lack any real action. Bottom line, the three branches of government still haven’t fully figured out the whole neuro-data thing and what it really means.

Without really getting how tech can mess things up, like with neurotechnologies, lawmakers can’t deal with the misunderstandings, scams, and theft that come from using these brain devices. If we don’t dig into the long history of human trafficking linked to stealing neurological data and using these gadgets, we won’t be able to find the crucial info needed to hold the companies accountable for ruining lives since the early ’90s.

In 2019, the United Nations sought public input on significant matters concerning neurological devices, non-consensual data capture, and the associated risks and treatments. This initiative is rooted in the principles set forth by the Human Rights Commission, established in 1946 and updated in 2006 within the framework of the General Assembly. Despite ongoing debates surrounding the concept of free will, it remains devoid of authoritative support. The systematic exploration of data commenced in the 1990s, with preliminary brain project models laying the groundwork for the National Institute of Health’s Brain Initiative around 2013, which concentrated on investigations into neuroplasticity.

Now, in 2025, we are embracing new laws and policies that truly acknowledge and safeguard neuro-data from misuse, ensuring that no one faces discrimination based on neuro-tech. It’s vital for us to protect individual rights and honor the universal code of consent, striving to shield the brain to the fullest extent possible.

The universal code of consent is fiercely championed not only by the United Nations but also by the United States, a testament to the unwavering commitment to uphold dignity and respect for all individuals across the globe.

However, society has the potential to thrive as countries engage with neurotechnology, provided they develop robust human rights laws and uphold high ethical standards.

Imagine a world where a strong code of positive ethics and legal frameworks safeguards human dignity from any form of rights abuse. In this vision, major corporations prioritize long-term sustainability and integrity, operating transparently under guidelines that promote human health and support enduring medical advancements. By fostering a deep understanding of human test subjects, we can leverage insights for ethical data analytics, elevate the fields of data science, and neurological studies, paving the way for groundbreaking discoveries that benefit society as a whole.

The inability to integrate the entirety of the model tree of information without the involvement of any government branch has effectively left humanity in a state of disarray.

The absence of acknowledged rights affects a significant portion of the global population, living in societies that ostensibly uphold human rights as a standard.

Now, neuro rights is finally gaining the attention it deserves. With the heartfelt recognition from Rafal Yuste of the Neuro Rights Foundation, a leading organization advocating for the vital expansion of our understanding of human rights to include neurological rights (neuro rights), we are taking critical steps towards safeguarding our mental and emotional well-being.

With an influx of innovative frameworks emerging from Europe, the American Medical Association, along with various state legislatures and representatives across the USA, is embracing a range of positive elements that are enhancing our healthcare landscape today!

As for Advocacy for Neuro Rights, we joyfully embrace the future, championing this inspiring new concept of human rights protection in this exciting new era.

We resolutely pursue truth and seek to uncover its depths.

Let there be light, a phrase that reverberates through the corridors of time, invoking visions of creation and clarity. It symbolizes the emergence of illumination amidst darkness, heralding not just physical brightness but a deeper understanding and enlightenment that transcends mere visibility. This profound declaration encourages us to seek knowledge and truth, shedding light on the complexities of existence and human experience, guiding us from ignorance into understanding, much like the dawn breaking after a long, uncertain night.

Advocacy for Neuro Rights Inc.

by Advocacy For Neuro Rights Organization

Advocacy for Neuro Rights Inc. shares important information about Neuro Rights and why they matter. Here’s an easy way to understand neuro rights.

Topics: Neuro Rights laws, petitions, and information about illegal research on people’s brains and computers. There are hidden abuses happening with brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) using AI technology. Some groups feel they can harm others through these means. We must stand against these actions. No one has the right to take people for research without their permission. No individual is so special that they deserve such violations of basic human rights.

Without consent, no one should conduct research on anyone indefinitely. When an organization tries to control another person’s mind using BCIs without legal or medical authority, they are able to commit the most heinous crimes of all time.

You cannot use someone else’s body to profit off of their data, invade their privacy, or neglect their rights. This is where we draw the line. Nobody has the right to your body. Neuroscience is a huge industry, and neuro data is incredibly valuable today.

Advocacy for Neuro Rights calls attention to these illegal actions against the public. Do you think you have the right to manipulate innocent people? You do not have the right to destroy lives by using AI and neurotechnology to control thoughts.

This must stop.

Advocacy for Neuro Rights is urging support for our proposed legislation: the Neuro Rights Protection Act. Join us in protecting citizens from the illegal use and cruelty of brain-computer interfaces.

Thank you for your support. Advocacy for Neuro Rights Inc.

Advocacy for Neuro Rights Inc.

by Advocacy For Neuro Rights Organization

Hello everyone, I’m excited to share that A4NR is gaining support by posting petitions for the Health and Human Services to review. We are raising awareness about illegal BCI (Brain to Computer Interfaces) and encouraging government action based on these efforts.

Please continue to support us by sharing our petitions and information! Change.org is hosting our petitions. So far, we have two petitions:

  1. The first petition asks for the option to opt out of any medical procedures that do not have informed consent. We’re concerned about the questionable practices that some hospitals and private entities pursue during medical experimentation.
  2. The second petition requests that the Health and Human Services investigate illegal chip implantation. We want them to look into these serious issues.

No one should have to suffer at the hands of others, which is why we advocate for laws that protect human rights and uphold medical ethics.

These petitions also seek reparations for those neglected by medical facilities, private organizations, and brain technology companies that have not prioritized people’s best interests in brain research. Many victims are discovering devices implanted in their bodies every day, and they are sometimes used for harmful research.

Let’s keep pushing forward and get these petitions signed. This is a crucial time for us all.

Change.org/hhsinvestigate

Change.org/optoutmedical

United Nations formally recognizing Cyber Torture

by Advocacy For Neuro Rights Organization

Cyber torture means using advanced technologies like AI, tiny gadgets, medical implants, smart software, and the internet to collect information from victims around the world. This situation harms society while causing minimal exploitation. Our client and advocacy services have uncovered cases of victims with illegal devices inside their bodies, based on medical reports from doctors. These devices are nano-technology and can be used on people without their consent.

These technologies can gather data and run different applications on people using nanotechnology, allowing research to occur without permission.

With these cyber-technologies and other invasive tools affecting thoughts, many individuals feel powerless against unwanted connections and interactions from those using these technologies.

We want to support Neuro Rights and protect people from harmful technologies that are hard to remove once they enter the body.

‘Cybertorture’ – A New Frontier in Human Rights Application?

Connecting the dots…

by Advocacy For Neuro Rights Organization

For Neuro Rights and advocacy, there seems to be little action regarding illegal implants of small devices and the symptoms of Havana syndrome, which can lead to neurological issues.

Victims of Havana syndrome believe it may be caused by a surveillance device that can harm the brain, causing ongoing mental pain and suffering.

I suspect that some people are being implanted with technology without their consent and are being tortured.

It appears that these implants are part of a larger neural network controlled by individuals. Neurotechnology can affect a person’s brain from a distance, suggesting that Havana syndrome may result from various types of neurotechnologies.

There is a new 60-minute video about Havana syndrome. While it may not directly address illegal implants and neural attacks, it does highlight the existence of different neurotechnologies. It’s interesting that these experiences can happen to many people across the U.S. and the world but are still not adequately recognized by the government.

We need changes, new policies, and better implementations. Supporting advocacy can lead to real change and help bring attention to the struggles of those affected by neurological issues.

I recommend we focus on ethical practices for companies and protect the rights of individuals regarding technology and artificial intelligence, especially within neural networks.

The number of neuro-afflicted victims is growing quickly, and soon we may see laws to protect individuals in these areas.

We need regulations on AI and neurotechnologies, along with international laws against stealing brain data without consent.

Advocacy for Neuro Rights aims to improve global privacy, safety, and data rights. It’s illegal for anyone to steal your data or use it for neurotechnology without your permission.

Stealing personal data is wrong and should be addressed in court. Biological data and neuro data deserve protection and should not be violated.

Havana syndrome cases are similar. There’s skepticism around the topic, with some believing only a few individuals while dismissing widespread reports of others suffering across the nation.

Hopefully, changes will come, but it may take time to achieve them.

Activism for Neuro Rights

by Advocacy For Neuro Rights Organization

Activism against neurological research and brain data collection began for my organization in 2017.

After realizing the issues many people were facing, I started my journey as an activist to help those affected in various ways.

In 2018, I began campaigning for a special day for neuro rights on August 29th. This day serves as an international event where victims of neurological issues unite to raise awareness and advocate for human rights against nonconsensual experimentation.

In 2019, I organized another international rally on April 26th and 27th in Sacramento, CA. Over 100 supporters from across the US participated in this two-day event. I also started a local support group for victims of neurotechnology, committing to weekly rallies, public speaking every Saturday, and distributing flyers to connect with those affected.

In 2020, I founded an organization called Targeted and Trafficked, aimed at fighting human trafficking related to neuro data theft and experimentation. Together with my group, we worked to expose the realities of neuro-human trafficking, where individuals are implanted and connected to a neural network for nonconsensual torture. I have participated in numerous conference calls and interviews, and have been featured in articles by organizations like Human Rights Watch and PACTS International.

With Targeted and Trafficked, I was able to advocate for neuro rights and communicate with politicians locally and across the US. My goal is to strengthen my organization to continue helping individuals affected by neurotechnology and work on legislation to protect their privacy and rights.

By continuing my advocacy, I hope to make it easier for neuro-afflicted victims to find support and recognition. New legislation is being introduced, and my involvement in advocacy should lead to even better outcomes.

I’ve also presented at various city councils and groups, and I plan to keep doing this in the future. I have dedicated myself to the community since day one.

Currently, I also work with a foreign organization focused on human and neuro rights, where I play a significant role in raising awareness for affected individuals and working towards stopping the exploitation of neuro data.

Throughout my time in this community, I have witnessed victims facing severe hardships, including death, homelessness, incarceration, and hospitalization. I believe that one day these issues will end, but for now, it seems we still have a long way to go.

Neuro rights and Global Regulation

by Advocacy For Neuro Rights Organization

Neuro Rights is becoming important worldwide. There are new efforts to manage devices that collect data. These ideas aim to protect people’s rights and freedoms.

Supporting Neuro Rights will greatly benefit everyone by promoting ethics in how our brains and data are treated.

No company, organization, or government should exploit individuals for their own benefit.

Concerns about stolen neuro data are rising, highlighting the need to protect citizens from being exploited for information. The collection of data, especially through metadata, is growing rapidly.

Thankfully, new laws are being introduced in the USA and globally.

As these protections are put in place, Advocacy for Neuro Rights will be there to help create new laws and rules.

As opportunities arise, we must work towards making the world safer and better.

Advocacy for Neuro Rights Inc.

https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/blog/the-time-is-now-for-a-neuro-rights-law-in-india/

Neuro Rights Legislation

by Advocacy For Neuro Rights Organization

Lewis Rowe, confirming that public initiatives are for the benefit for the public good in all domains for the state of Arizona.

Initiatives are included as follows:

Activating the initiative for the probable cause of illegal implanting and the longevity of the procedures that conform to human experimentation by neurotech devices. As stated in the Mk ultra documents that were provided by the Church Committee in the 1970’s about unwitting experiments conducted on individuals without awareness and consent during the era of the 1950’s. These experiments proceeded unknowingly to individuals throughout the public. In the 1990’s Bill Clinton, the United States president apologized for the human experimentation that were involved with Mk ultra.

In this summary I will provide documents and information to the illegal implanting of small high-tech devices for better understanding of the probable cause issues at hand. Resorting to information from the past, leading to the efforts of individuals using the same pattern routines as in the days of Mk ultra that were conducted for research of individuals that were compromised for illegal experimentation.

Neuroethics and neurology are serious endeavors into the field of scientific research and study. Research and study for example, further brain research through the use of artificial intelligence (AI). Proposing new laws for the state of Arizona, in the US are examples of the prolonged and unwitting efforts for neuro BCI (Brain to computer interfaces) illegal chipping with micro semiconductors. The same probable cause of units that are nonconsesual injections into the human body with small devices capable of traveling to specific locations in the human body.

Through illegal BCI device usage by injections, the capabilities of these devices utilize the functionality of artificial intelligence neuro information datasets. Datasets of modeling concepts of the human brain grasped by neuroscience, neuro imaging, neuro modulated systems acquired by artificial intelligence, neuro doctors and scientists. Artificial intelligence acts upon training based algorithms and algorithmic parameters; setting the brain modeling algorithmic procedures and parameters for the AI’s system to be utilized and functional. A type of neurotechnology AI model that connects to the human body, via brain to computer interfaces, small BCI implants which are micro semiconductors.

New ethics need to be involved protecting the public from the type of devices that accumulate data theft of physical biology. These concepts of the human brain have been precisely modeled for parameter use and discovery projects into more in depth human body anatomy, neurological and data sequenced analysis. Mimicking the neuro biological member, that is the individual used for heavily sedating configurations of neurotechnology and the bypass of individuals consciousness.

Case for Barbra Lindsey, resident of Texas illegally implanted by a doctor at a dermatology office with two small devices in her forehead. Case number to the supreme court No. 05-20-01081-CV.
After Barbra Lindsey discovered she was implanted the small devices and were medically removed and sent to a college university in California for examination. The university determined the small implants as super high-tech devices. As Barbra Lindsey the unwitting victim of illegal and nonconsensual implantation, began a court case against the dermatology office that assumed the role of implanting Ms. Barbra Lindsey unknowingly.

Cases such as Barbra Lindsey’s are happening all over the country of the United States of America.

With multiple cases over the issues of being injected by doctors at different hospitals and cities, states, etc. These cases led to illegal brain to computer interface intelligence research programs, restricting an individual from help or medical treatment and restrictions on neuro freedom and cognitive abilities as if the individual is possessed.

The neurotechnology bills in both states that include Colorado and Minnesota read as personal cognitive freedoms are fundamentals of neuro privacy and with informed consent only to enter an individuals mind. These are new legislation’s awaiting to be passed hopefully by the end of the year, 2024.

The two bills set for voting need to be comprehended by all state governments, legislatures, congressmen and including the senate. Gaining momentum for the state of Arizona and all other states to consider passing legislation on neurotechnology, neuro data theft, neurological and biological information protections against mental manipulationsand laws against the entities unitizing the approaches to capture brain data, via remote neurotechnology that uses dangerous methods for unwitting for individuals that come with consequences, due to the fact there are no laws against such acts.

The drafted legislation for Arizona, would be approached in ways to propose and present new crime fighting units to stop illegal use of neurotechnology. Apprehending individuals using remote brain to computer interfaces and all other forms of neurotechnology that are capable and able to steal personal information from an individual. Police departments need to be more with advanced with cyber-networks and communication based algorithms to capture these entities. Through, either localized police detective units or through interconnected jurisdictions as the state would allow. A funding grant for local and state government police, would be able to help protect people from these vicious crimes that can put an individual’s brain in the hands of another.

These legislative means for police should be added to the bill for purposes of state funding, opening newer model departments for neuro theft as we approach the times for super advanced technology. Adding a prolonged endeavor of methods and means to incarcerate the individuals bound by state laws for the use of illegal and critical and emerging technologies.

I will also add attachments for the both bills Colorado HB 24-1058 and Minnesota HF 1904 at the bottom for review by the city government.