Tag: ai

Neuro Rights Update 7/5/25

by A4NR

By Lewis Rowe

Advocacy for Neuro Rights has shed some light on what it really means to have neurology-based consent when it comes to our individuality. Considering the impact of tech and pharmaceuticals, it’s honestly pretty messed up how some folks are trying to capture and store our personal data. Data collection could seriously change the game, especially if we get to use info from neurological research. But without a solid backup from the outdated legal systems we have and with due process being totally ignored, we’re stuck with a bunch of useless laws that don’t really help—just federal codes and state laws that lack any real action. Bottom line, the three branches of government still haven’t fully figured out the whole neuro-data thing and what it really means.

Without really getting how tech can mess things up, like with neurotechnologies, lawmakers can’t deal with the misunderstandings, scams, and theft that come from using these brain devices. If we don’t dig into the long history of human trafficking linked to stealing neurological data and using these gadgets, we won’t be able to find the crucial info needed to hold the companies accountable for ruining lives since the early ’90s.

In 2019, the United Nations sought public input on significant matters concerning neurological devices, non-consensual data capture, and the associated risks and treatments. This initiative is rooted in the principles set forth by the Human Rights Commission, established in 1946 and updated in 2006 within the framework of the General Assembly. Despite ongoing debates surrounding the concept of free will, it remains devoid of authoritative support. The systematic exploration of data commenced in the 1990s, with preliminary brain project models laying the groundwork for the National Institute of Health’s Brain Initiative around 2013, which concentrated on investigations into neuroplasticity.

Now, in 2025, we are embracing new laws and policies that truly acknowledge and safeguard neuro-data from misuse, ensuring that no one faces discrimination based on neuro-tech. It’s vital for us to protect individual rights and honor the universal code of consent, striving to shield the brain to the fullest extent possible.

The universal code of consent is fiercely championed not only by the United Nations but also by the United States, a testament to the unwavering commitment to uphold dignity and respect for all individuals across the globe.

However, society has the potential to thrive as countries engage with neurotechnology, provided they develop robust human rights laws and uphold high ethical standards.

Imagine a world where a strong code of positive ethics and legal frameworks safeguards human dignity from any form of rights abuse. In this vision, major corporations prioritize long-term sustainability and integrity, operating transparently under guidelines that promote human health and support enduring medical advancements. By fostering a deep understanding of human test subjects, we can leverage insights for ethical data analytics, elevate the fields of data science, and neurological studies, paving the way for groundbreaking discoveries that benefit society as a whole.

The inability to integrate the entirety of the model tree of information without the involvement of any government branch has effectively left humanity in a state of disarray.

The absence of acknowledged rights affects a significant portion of the global population, living in societies that ostensibly uphold human rights as a standard.

Now, neuro rights is finally gaining the attention it deserves. With the heartfelt recognition from Rafal Yuste of the Neuro Rights Foundation, a leading organization advocating for the vital expansion of our understanding of human rights to include neurological rights (neuro rights), we are taking critical steps towards safeguarding our mental and emotional well-being.

With an influx of innovative frameworks emerging from Europe, the American Medical Association, along with various state legislatures and representatives across the USA, is embracing a range of positive elements that are enhancing our healthcare landscape today!

As for Advocacy for Neuro Rights, we joyfully embrace the future, championing this inspiring new concept of human rights protection in this exciting new era.

We resolutely pursue truth and seek to uncover its depths.

Let there be light, a phrase that reverberates through the corridors of time, invoking visions of creation and clarity. It symbolizes the emergence of illumination amidst darkness, heralding not just physical brightness but a deeper understanding and enlightenment that transcends mere visibility. This profound declaration encourages us to seek knowledge and truth, shedding light on the complexities of existence and human experience, guiding us from ignorance into understanding, much like the dawn breaking after a long, uncertain night.

Connecting the dots…

by A4NR

For Neuro Rights and advocacy, there seems to be little action regarding illegal implants of small devices and the symptoms of Havana syndrome, which can lead to neurological issues.

Victims of Havana syndrome believe it may be caused by a surveillance device that can harm the brain, causing ongoing mental pain and suffering.

I suspect that some people are being implanted with technology without their consent and are being tortured.

It appears that these implants are part of a larger neural network controlled by individuals. Neurotechnology can affect a person’s brain from a distance, suggesting that Havana syndrome may result from various types of neurotechnologies.

There is a new 60-minute video about Havana syndrome. While it may not directly address illegal implants and neural attacks, it does highlight the existence of different neurotechnologies. It’s interesting that these experiences can happen to many people across the U.S. and the world but are still not adequately recognized by the government.

We need changes, new policies, and better implementations. Supporting advocacy can lead to real change and help bring attention to the struggles of those affected by neurological issues.

I recommend we focus on ethical practices for companies and protect the rights of individuals regarding technology and artificial intelligence, especially within neural networks.

The number of neuro-afflicted victims is growing quickly, and soon we may see laws to protect individuals in these areas.

We need regulations on AI and neurotechnologies, along with international laws against stealing brain data without consent.

Advocacy for Neuro Rights aims to improve global privacy, safety, and data rights. It’s illegal for anyone to steal your data or use it for neurotechnology without your permission.

Stealing personal data is wrong and should be addressed in court. Biological data and neuro data deserve protection and should not be violated.

Havana syndrome cases are similar. There’s skepticism around the topic, with some believing only a few individuals while dismissing widespread reports of others suffering across the nation.

Hopefully, changes will come, but it may take time to achieve them.

Neuro rights and Global Regulation

by A4NR

Neuro Rights is becoming important worldwide. There are new efforts to manage devices that collect data. These ideas aim to protect people’s rights and freedoms.

Supporting Neuro Rights will greatly benefit everyone by promoting ethics in how our brains and data are treated.

No company, organization, or government should exploit individuals for their own benefit.

Concerns about stolen neuro data are rising, highlighting the need to protect citizens from being exploited for information. The collection of data, especially through metadata, is growing rapidly.

Thankfully, new laws are being introduced in the USA and globally.

As these protections are put in place, Advocacy for Neuro Rights will be there to help create new laws and rules.

As opportunities arise, we must work towards making the world safer and better.

Advocacy for Neuro Rights Inc.

https://vidhilegalpolicy.in/blog/the-time-is-now-for-a-neuro-rights-law-in-india/

Neuro Rights Legislation

by A4NR

Lewis Rowe, confirming that public initiatives are for the benefit for the public good in all domains for the state of Arizona.

Initiatives are included as follows:

Activating the initiative for the probable cause of illegal implanting and the longevity of the procedures that conform to human experimentation by neurotech devices. As stated in the Mk ultra documents that were provided by the Church Committee in the 1970’s about unwitting experiments conducted on individuals without awareness and consent during the era of the 1950’s. These experiments proceeded unknowingly to individuals throughout the public. In the 1990’s Bill Clinton, the United States president apologized for the human experimentation that were involved with Mk ultra.

In this summary I will provide documents and information to the illegal implanting of small high-tech devices for better understanding of the probable cause issues at hand. Resorting to information from the past, leading to the efforts of individuals using the same pattern routines as in the days of Mk ultra that were conducted for research of individuals that were compromised for illegal experimentation.

Neuroethics and neurology are serious endeavors into the field of scientific research and study. Research and study for example, further brain research through the use of artificial intelligence (AI). Proposing new laws for the state of Arizona, in the US are examples of the prolonged and unwitting efforts for neuro BCI (Brain to computer interfaces) illegal chipping with micro semiconductors. The same probable cause of units that are nonconsesual injections into the human body with small devices capable of traveling to specific locations in the human body.

Through illegal BCI device usage by injections, the capabilities of these devices utilize the functionality of artificial intelligence neuro information datasets. Datasets of modeling concepts of the human brain grasped by neuroscience, neuro imaging, neuro modulated systems acquired by artificial intelligence, neuro doctors and scientists. Artificial intelligence acts upon training based algorithms and algorithmic parameters; setting the brain modeling algorithmic procedures and parameters for the AI’s system to be utilized and functional. A type of neurotechnology AI model that connects to the human body, via brain to computer interfaces, small BCI implants which are micro semiconductors.

New ethics need to be involved protecting the public from the type of devices that accumulate data theft of physical biology. These concepts of the human brain have been precisely modeled for parameter use and discovery projects into more in depth human body anatomy, neurological and data sequenced analysis. Mimicking the neuro biological member, that is the individual used for heavily sedating configurations of neurotechnology and the bypass of individuals consciousness.

Case for Barbra Lindsey, resident of Texas illegally implanted by a doctor at a dermatology office with two small devices in her forehead. Case number to the supreme court No. 05-20-01081-CV.
After Barbra Lindsey discovered she was implanted the small devices and were medically removed and sent to a college university in California for examination. The university determined the small implants as super high-tech devices. As Barbra Lindsey the unwitting victim of illegal and nonconsensual implantation, began a court case against the dermatology office that assumed the role of implanting Ms. Barbra Lindsey unknowingly.

Cases such as Barbra Lindsey’s are happening all over the country of the United States of America.

With multiple cases over the issues of being injected by doctors at different hospitals and cities, states, etc. These cases led to illegal brain to computer interface intelligence research programs, restricting an individual from help or medical treatment and restrictions on neuro freedom and cognitive abilities as if the individual is possessed.

The neurotechnology bills in both states that include Colorado and Minnesota read as personal cognitive freedoms are fundamentals of neuro privacy and with informed consent only to enter an individuals mind. These are new legislation’s awaiting to be passed hopefully by the end of the year, 2024.

The two bills set for voting need to be comprehended by all state governments, legislatures, congressmen and including the senate. Gaining momentum for the state of Arizona and all other states to consider passing legislation on neurotechnology, neuro data theft, neurological and biological information protections against mental manipulationsand laws against the entities unitizing the approaches to capture brain data, via remote neurotechnology that uses dangerous methods for unwitting for individuals that come with consequences, due to the fact there are no laws against such acts.

The drafted legislation for Arizona, would be approached in ways to propose and present new crime fighting units to stop illegal use of neurotechnology. Apprehending individuals using remote brain to computer interfaces and all other forms of neurotechnology that are capable and able to steal personal information from an individual. Police departments need to be more with advanced with cyber-networks and communication based algorithms to capture these entities. Through, either localized police detective units or through interconnected jurisdictions as the state would allow. A funding grant for local and state government police, would be able to help protect people from these vicious crimes that can put an individual’s brain in the hands of another.

These legislative means for police should be added to the bill for purposes of state funding, opening newer model departments for neuro theft as we approach the times for super advanced technology. Adding a prolonged endeavor of methods and means to incarcerate the individuals bound by state laws for the use of illegal and critical and emerging technologies.

I will also add attachments for the both bills Colorado HB 24-1058 and Minnesota HF 1904 at the bottom for review by the city government.